| Question | Answer | Description | Datasource and Evidence | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of sites delivered annually | No Evidence | What is the actual number of serviced sites provided? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | No data |
| MSTF annual target | Strong Evidence | What is the annual target to deliver serviced sites? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | 4,000 households per annum |
| Are projects prioritised according to NUSP technical support? | No Evidence | There is a high likelihood that NUSP technical support to prioritised projects resulted in more detailed planning, and needs to be incorporated. |
BEPP 2018/19 | Not mentioned |
| Does the strategy mention national government / MSTF targets towards 2019? | Strong Evidence | In 2015 the National Department of Human Settlements committed to upgrade 750,000 informal settlement households. Does the city take these targets into account? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | "14,810 households by 2019 |
| % of target reached in 2016/17 | No Evidence | What is the percentage of actual vs. target sites delivered? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | No data |
| Are the specific settlements identified? | Partial Evidence | Identifying prioritised settlements indicates the city government is making progress. |
IDP/ BEPP 2016/17 review | Motherwell, Jachtvlakte/Kwanobuhle; Walmer; N2; Ibhayi/Njoli Node; |
| Likely to reach the target? | No Evidence | Is the city government likely to reach its target by 2019 based on annual delivery rate? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | No data |
| Is there an indication that NUSP (Department of Human Settlements) technical support to the city have been incorporated into planning? | Partial Evidence | NUSP/HDA technical support was provided to all cities (and many other municipalities). |
BEPP 2018/19 | Engagement with NUSP in order to assess the processes and technical development of informal settlements, as well as to align pratices and alignment with other Metros. |