Question | Answer | Description | Datasource and Evidence | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
# of sites delivered annually | Strong Evidence | What is the actual number of serviced sites provided? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | 1,099 sites delivered in 2015/16 |
MSTF annual target | Strong Evidence | What is the annual target to deliver serviced sites? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | 3,796 households per annum |
Are projects prioritised according to NUSP technical support? | Strong Evidence | There is a high likelihood that NUSP technical support to prioritised projects resulted in more detailed planning, and needs to be incorporated. |
IDP/ BEPP 2016/17 review | 32 settlements |
Does the strategy mention national government / MSTF targets towards 2019? | Strong Evidence | In 2015 the National Department of Human Settlements committed to upgrade 750,000 informal settlement households. Does the city take these targets into account? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | "18,980 households by 2019 " |
% of target reached in 2016/17 | No Evidence | What is the percentage of actual vs. target sites delivered? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | 29% |
Are the specific settlements identified? | Strong Evidence | Identifying prioritised settlements indicates the city government is making progress. |
BEPP 2017/18 review | Mdantsane, Duncan Village, Zwelitsha, Ginsberg, Dimbaza, Ilitha, and Phakamisa |
Likely to reach the target? | No Evidence | Is the city government likely to reach its target by 2019 based on annual delivery rate? |
National Treasury evaluation, 2016 | No |
Is there an indication that NUSP (Department of Human Settlements) technical support to the city have been incorporated into planning? | Strong Evidence | NUSP/HDA technical support was provided to all cities (and many other municipalities). |
IDP/ BEPP 2016/17 review | NUSP entailed detailed settlement planning for a selected number of settlements. |